Simon Ricketts
Session
Report:
Drama and
Shakespeare
The session
started with an introductory exercise trying to gauge everybody’s
experience and comfort with teaching Drama. A hammer was laid on the floor.
Those closest to the tool were the most comfortable with the idea of teaching
the subject; those in the corridor the most apprehensive.
This served two
purposes:
1.
It allowed
the group to see how we all felt about the prospect of teaching.
2.
It was a
working example of a starter piece that we could use in the future.
The hammer got everybody on their feet and put some
minds at ease that they were not the only people feeling somewhat
uncomfortable. As a practical tool it also demonstrated that there are ways to
quickly and easily get pupils on their feet and into a working mode using only
a hammer.
The Hot-seat
When the prospective “hot-seater” sits
down they assume the role of a character. As this was a lesson on Shakespeare,
Kate chose Hamlet. We were not informed of this beforehand. It was to be
deduced from questions put to her by us. This proved a useful demonstration:
1.
We could use
this as an introduction to a play.
2.
Role play
adds a third dimension to the character making it easier for the class to
envisage them and thereby to identify with the text.
3.
It also proves
a challenge to the class while they try to find out who is being acted out.
4.
While they are playing at amateur
sleuths they are also without realizing it exploring the nature of the
character and thus learning.
So therefore, the chair while fun is also a good way
of teaching characterisation almost subconsciously.
Once off the seat
the role play is over and the teacher returns. This allows us to keep control.
This is because the chair acts as a physical reminder of when teacher is acting
and teaching.
Freeze Frames
We were given a segment of Macbeth and each told to
create three froze scenes from the text. As we went round the groups there were
clear patterns as to our collective selections. When discussing this as a group
it was decided that we could use this in the following ways:
1.
As a more
entertaining way of getting the children to dissect a piece of text. (As they
trawl the passage looking for moments they are also examining the segment as a
whole).
2.
When patterns
emerged it became apparent that we had all pretty much chosen the key moments
from the passage.
3.
We were asked
to choose a line to sum up certain people’s work. As different people
were asked different answers were given, prompting discussion of the text.
We were given a specific time allotment for the work
and Kate used a simple piece of psychology. We were given 4 minutes. As when
people hear that they have five or ten minutes to do something they go into
some form of autopilot. However, when hit with a time that is not so usual and
does not have connotations of “let’s do nothing for eight”
then they get to work. It assumes a sense of urgency that acts as a kick start.
Improvised Role Play
We were given a scenario to develop. What would have
seemed a random idea to a class was actually the basic plot of the beginning to
Hamlet. Once again Kate played with our perspectives of time giving us eight
minutes. This segment taught us the following:
1.
We could get
the children thinking about the emotions of the characters before they even knew
who the characters were.
2.
It would get
them thinking a stage direction and mood setting.
3.
We could also
move between the groups gauging their thoughts and abilities.
4.
It allowed us
to police the less diligent.
Kate explained that it was necessary not to stop the
flow of the class by interrupting the work they were doing. However, we could
work within the groups helping them to develop the ideas that they were having.
This exercise was another example of getting the class
to think about what they were learning without actually sitting them in front
of what they were about to learn. Although this was a lesson on Shakespeare the
tips we picked up were easily applicable to any study of a play.